Politics Thread

there really is no evidence they i can pull up rn but tbh look at how much america has changed sense its beginning so many people are trying to work around the Constitution and this global warming **** would be a way to take away freedom "justly" as they would say, same thing is happening with guns the government really want to take away those even tho it goes against the Constitution, but i'm not so sure about how other countries are making away with this globally warming stuff

and tbh America can go back to the stone age and live in caves and eat raw food and nothing will happen to the carbon dioxide level, China and India are making like all of the carbon dioxide "problems"

 

Yeah, i totally see the arguement, but their comes a time where you have to vote for the lesser of two evils. Look at the election of 96 for example. Ross Perot was alot like George H W in terms of Policy, but his presence in the election gave Bill the molester a free ticket for the white house. Did Perot gain some great spot on the cabinet or something? No........ he just threw another wrench in the works

CAFE regulations require a car manufacturer to have a fleet average of 40mpg by 2025 or so to be able to sell a vehicle in California, the nations biggest auto market. If a prius represents freedom more than a Charger SRT Hellcat, im not sure which planet you are from. Do you know what manufacturer will probably never make the cut by 2025? Jaguar-Land Rover.......bye bye beverly hills Range Rovers. How is that not that not taking freedoms? Not to mention the carbon emissions taxes.

 

Get back to me in 2025 and tell me if you would like to drive a more economical car now that the planet is much hotter.

I never said this was limited to only the USA. I've already said numerous times that this is a global problem.
And as guns are not my area of expertise so please excuse me if this seems like a lot of rambling on. But, gun control and taking away guns are two completely different things. And what is in the Constitution is basically what gives human rights to the people and prevents the government from taking the rights away. I personally don't think guns are a human right, nor do I think they'll ever be needed to defend your human rights unless the government totally collapses, in which case all amendments and laws become obsolete. I also think that the 2nd amendment was put in because at the time Americans needed weapons to possibly defend themselves from a British soldier or someone of the like. On top of this, the weapons at the time were more or less limited to muskets. Now you see automatic weapons, shotguns, semi-automatic weapons, rifles, and many, many other types of guns so much more advanced and deadly than the ones from 230 years ago. Congress was given the power to expand its power over time (see "Elastic Clause") and regulate items. There are regulations on products today like computers and phones (that didn't exist 230 years ago) because of this clause. So Congress should be able to regulate these new weapons without going against the Constitution.

 

Um........global temperature hasnt increased ONE DEGREE since 1998. plus, i would LOVE for it to be 10 degrees warmer. I cycle alot, its always so f*cking cold!!! Plus, when im 25, id like to be driving a hellcat...but realistically, it'd prob be more like an 08 SRT Charger.......id very happily be burning my own personal hole in the ozone and id make all u gay lib-tards stand under it.

Guns are much safer today then 250 years ago....they dont misfire and are highly accurate........If anything, work on mental health and step up immigration restrictions.

 

well well i see u don't stand for the 2nd amendment if guns get taken away we as a people become helpless animals under a strong government,

 

Yep, the constitution is the law of the land and we cant let power-hungry governent control the people, otherwise we'd be same as china or other country. (or stig in norway)

 

Now that Ben is outta the running, who do u support for POTUS?

 

no one
there is no way anyone but hillary or trump can get it now it seems so....
idk i do not support either and if one of them will win i want trump

 

But if we have a contested convntion, would you go with Cruz over Trump? Bevasue its begining to look like thats where its headed

 

idk cruz is too weak imo
idk tho i would say i like them the same

 

Hes a good debater........idk, ive supported cruz from day 1, i think he carries the American Dream.

yeah.....but trump has no chance against Billary

 

lol idk trump is doing pretty well somehow i think he can beat hillary i mean he is the only one that can on the replication side

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_presidential_race.html

Take a look at those......sure, hillary is beating Cruz as well, but its within margin of error. Plus cruz wont get flustered on the stage like trump does

 

only time will tell i guess, polls really mean nothing

 

We'll see what the RNC says at the convention!

 

Again, the government does not want to take your guns, it only wants to regulate them.

I would really love to see your sources. Many, many sources (including mine and the image that Freddy brought up) say that the temperature has risen at least 1.8 degrees, and that is taking into account the oceans and icecaps, which lower the average global temperature. The temperature change on the land is much higher. And as for the fact that you love warmer weather, great! However, if I were you, I'd be more worried about the impending drought and wildfire that comes with the temperatures and the millions of people whose homes are threatened by rising seas than good bike weather.

 

Registered to vote 2day

 

This thread is pretty stupid tbh

Jus call it Arguments Thread.