Argument thread

here

 

don't worry i have it right here

 

guys right wing politicians are conspiring to collect our vitals as we sleep!!! the only way to stop this is by covering your mattress in tin foil, thank me later

 

as far as we can tell. They are still theorizing different ways, and thats just how we think.

But, *youstupid* the argument isn't the shape of the universe, its whether or not you can return to the same spot. You say, no, I say yes.

 

hahaha so funny (its not)

 

agree with you there
they are theorizing
just theories
but as far as we can tell, the universe is flat

 

And nasa has agreed that it is possible.

 

ok so how does this all relate to religion again?

 

theoretically possible but with no evidence
you're going off of theories with no proof
i'm going off of what we know so far
what we have so far > theories

 

"not one battle close to losing" :laugh: We lost almost every battle for the first four and a half years of war, and still after that we lost about half of our battles until Yorktown. Are you reading your post? "We might not have made it without the French." Also, "The pure fact that we did win, regardless of help." You just said that we might not have won without help, but the fact that we did win without help? Not trying to be mean, but your argument has so many holes it would sink faster than the Titanic, if you catch my drift. The British won the French and Indian war. I don't know what you're trying to get me to think about with that war, but maybe clarify later? Britain was wrong for imposing all those things on the colonists, but back in its place? What exactly is that place? The loser? As I have already pointed out, Britain ruled a lot of the known world for a hundred years or so, a lot of it for more. We beat Britain because they were tired of sending people over to die fighting a bunch of rednecks, no disrespect to the Founding Fathers, not because we put them in their place.

 

this is a whole different convo going on for no reason other than chaos.

 

was talking to AfterImage not you
i'll make sure to mention AfterImage from now on

 

I know. lol.

 

alright. i guess i have to debunk your subjective take on my factually objective post.

1.
2.
3.

that concludes my evidence, your rebuttal is not necessary, as this persuasion is bullet-proof, youll come to see this as you try to come up with a response, so ill save your time by warning you not to bother. i hope that this is not too detrimental to your well-being, but if it happens to be, i could not bother to do anything about it. have a nice day, afterimage.

 

:facepalm: you dont understand. if the universe works in the way we think, and nasa has pretty much proven, we could get back to the same spot. I digress.

Imagine it this way. If there were a bunch of 2d things, that had never seen anything 3d and they slid all the way around their planet and ended up at the same spot they would be supremely confused because they cant comprehend the way it works.

 

wow.

 

But either way the universe is finite, but ever expanding so we wouldn't be able to do it if we didn't age unless we moved faster than the speed of light

 

if they were 2d they wouldn't be able to bend, right? So their planet would have to be flat with some portals on either end, that way they would be sapped across the planet and still be flat, right? Otherwise how would they slide around the whole planet?

 

no one got anywhere without theories, and all of this is theoretic. give me proof its flat. "as far as we can tell" aint facts

 

neither are you presenting facts yknowI'mjustsayin