Games Contest

i was like 1/8th of the way done but is still published it so i have a shot

 

come on, todays the 21st!

 

Lol did we just get ripped off? I didnt put GC in my track title for fun

 

Komo Nathaneon the_rider
you guys should come together and decide the results. im thinking char could transfer the coins from lightnings user to the winners

 

Shoot, sorry, I totally forgot about the deadline. We'll get to judging the tracks ASAP, the results should be out soon. /The whole Coin transfer dealio is not concerned with me though....ask Nathaneon

 

yea, i had pretty good track, but it wasnt finished and i didnt see it going anywhere, so i trashed it

 

good thing u said that because i wuz sorta maybe about to go ape on Lightning-Quick for not even responding to us.

 

Char could we have a coin prize for this contest once we're done judging?

 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

VOTE!!!

 

26th now and still results not out!

 

I'm done with all the judging (which took forever lol), but everybody else is just slackin' I think.

 

I wish i finished in time

 

I could just post my results right now, but it depends if you guys want to know all the results at once later, or have me post my results, and I add on all the other judge's results when they're done?

 

wait on everyone

 

Alright then, will do. My results only? New thread, or would y'all prefer me to post it on this thread?

 

Stig we all know you won so just take the monies

 

BlobGuy -BattleBlock Theatre -BattleBlock Theatre

Track/ Ridability: 6
Detail: 6.5

Relation to the game: 6.5

Some of the detail seemed a bit sloppy, while the track itself was difficult to follow through, and was not a trial track. Therefore, I gave the track itself a 6 for the clear lines, but the positioning of the track itself was hard to understand. The detail/relation to the game was quite clear, including the characters from the game, as well as keeping the lines clean. I feel like you could’ve spent much more time on it, but it was a good track, nothing too special.


Todredrob -Pokemon

Track/ Ridability: 4.5
Detail: 4

Relation to the game: 3

The track started off as a short auto, then progressed into a playable track, so it was creative...I guess? It was hard to follow on what the track actually was, but it was smooth to ride. The rest...I was confused. Were you trying? There were random lines and blocks of black in random places, and the writing of “pokemon” was extremely messy. The drawn pokemon was the reason I gave a 4, because of the clean lines and resemblance to the pokemon. Besides that, the extra lines and random things were just confusing, so the relation to the game was a 3. Could’ve spent a lot more time on the detail and writing.


Flying_T_Rex -Legends of Zelda

Track/ Ridability: 4.5
Detail: 7

Relation to the game: 5

The track itself wasn’t very smooth, but I understand that it was more based on detail. Since the track isn’t complete yet, I just judged on the preview you put up. The track wasn’t really ridable, a bit rocky and un-smooth in places, so I gave it a 4.5. The detail was fantastic, but since there was so little of it I could only give it a 7, and I gave a 5 for the relation to the game because honestly, if you didn’t know it was for Zelda, you’d just think it was a forest. No characters, or anything. Also, the track is very small. I can’t wait to see the final track though!






Woodmas -Cabela's series - Cabela's

Track/ Ridability: 6
Detail: 4.5

Relation to the game: 5


The track was a smooth, uncomplicated ride. The reason why I gave it a 6 was it’s common-ness and how you only put slight jumps and that was it. Not to mention it was fairly short, it seemed as if you barely put much effort into it. The detail was simple, with a few people and animals, and not much. This was the same reason I gave the relation to the game a 5, because of it’s overly simple details. If you hadn’t put Cabela’s in the title, I would think it was an average detailed deer and people track. Nothing that put it in the “Cabela’s” catergory.


Skeeny -Mario Kart

Track/ Ridability: 6.5
Detail: 7

Relation to the game: 7.5

The track itself was a hold-up, and it worked! it was smooth, clean, and easy to ride. I took off 3.5 points for lack of creativity, because I would’ve preferred a track for the rider to play on instead. But aside from the track, the detail was pretty good! The pixel art was clean and well done, and you could tell clearly what the characters were supposed to be. It slides in smooth with the next requirement, which is that the track went very well with the theme, mario kart. The 2.5 points were taken off because there were no actual KARTS, so there was that tangent missing. Aside from that, great track!


Stig- Mario Bros

Track/ Ridability: 8.5
Detail: 9.5

Relation to the game: 10

The track was a bit complicated to follow with, but other than that, you put a lot of effort into the incorporating the track into the detail, so I gave an 8 for the track itself. The 1.5 points were taken off for some awkward parts where I didn’t know where to go, but if you looked at the ghosts, you would see that the track flows very nice together. The detail was simple amazing, with the whole level in the track. I was flabbergasted to see all the amazing art and characters, and background. You made it seem like the game was just layered into FRHD, so very well done on the detail. .5 points taken off because as amazing as it was, there’s always room for improvement Relation to the game received full points from me, well, it’s pretty obvious. It looked exactly like the actual game! Very well done, I can tell it took a lot of time.



jroles -Tetris - Tetris

Track/ Ridability: 0.5
Detail: 5.5

Relation to the game: 6

There literally was no track whatsoever, you just pushed the up key so get the star...no flow, no track. I gave a 0.5, and even that was being generous. The detail was fairly good, the lines were clean and there were no random scribbles. I feel like you could’ve shaded more, but it’s up to you. I compared it to a real picture of tetris, and the art/detail was fairly accurate! There were some missing details, so I gave a 6 for the relation to the game. Overall, the track basically nothing, but the detail was okay. It was a decent track, it just looked like you spent 10 minutes on it.


kadinl14 -Excitebike

Track/ Ridability: 6.5
Detail: 5.5

Relation to the game: 7

The track itself tied in nicely with the game, and it gave a slight challenge to normal riders! it was fun, and the track was decent length, but it was nothing too special. The detail was simple, created out of lines and no shading. Aside from that, it was VERY neat, and the relation to the game was great! If you compared the real game to it, they were very similar in shape, so I gave a 7 for the similarities. Overall, it was a fairly simple track with decent detail.


FreeRider5 -Angry Birds

Track/ Ridability: 2.5
Detail: 4

Relation to the game: 4.5

The track itself was….really simple, and short. Nothing more to be said. The detail was a bit sloppy, and again, it was fairly short. It was fairly neat in the writing though, but there wasn’t too much detail besides the birds. It looked like angry birds though, which got you the 4.5, because you could easily tell that it was Angry Birds. So in a nutshell, it looked like something you made in 10 minutes, there wasn’t too much effort from what I saw. It was a fairly normal track.

1st Place- Stig (Super Mario Bros)
2nd Place- Skeeny (Mario Kart)
3rd Place- Tie: Kadinl14 and Blobguy (Excitebike & Battleblock Theater)
Congratulations to the winners, and to those who participated!
Coin award has nothing to do with me, that's for Lightning-Quick to decide and handle.

 

I could've entered my trash track and came in second by those results, I had loads of detail, could ride good, was almost completed related, so,.. Yea

 

Awesome!!! i may have tied, for third, but this really means a lot.