They 100% could be. All I was saying was that with no shading, the first one gives the impression of someone (the viewer/rider) on the "ground level" looking up a tree, something that would typically be used in foreground detailing or height, where as the second photo looks more dead on with little to no angle on the perspective, something that would be used more in background detailing or depth.
Ok the first one does make some sense to be from a lower point of view and the second one from a higher point of view because at the lower point of view you see the branches from the trunk and then as the viewer goes higher then those branches go behind the leaves. I don't really get what you're saying about foreground and background but are you meaning that if tree is in foreground then you can see the branches up top because maybe you're lower than the tree because trees are tall and the foreground is where you are.
That’s exactly what I meant! Just look at trees from different angles and distances and you’ll see better what I’m trying to get at
can you guess which remix contest winner i am up to? track is almost done, i'll be releasing within a few days most likely
I made an edit to a track I was working on, it was meant to be a HOLDUP but now it turned into a nearly impossible track halfway through. I was thinking about giving it to whomever may want it. -> HERE <- There's a star for scale on the 2nd screenshot. and EDIT: Apparently, I don't know how to post a pic.
