Non Trump Supporters

Which I was doing only because I was getting the same thing, however, I'd prefer not to do it because there's no practical, meaningful use for it.

 

https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/in-2020-a-majority-want-someone-new-in-wh-poll-1456362051828

 

They said more or less the same thing about Hillary Clinton...

 

Puny libtards have nothing better to do than accuse Trump of being an idiot when something so minuscule and silly happens. Get a life.

 

Puny libtards

 

Yeah, I think the first word was definitely unnecessary. Like saying wet water.

 

sorry your favorite president got made fun of too hard

 

I don't mind making fun of a president at all, and since he's technically a politician I love a good Donald Trump joke too. But the intent here isn't to poke some fun at him, it's to degrade him and make him sound like a dishonest, egotistical person (which he's not).

 

then tell me how Mexico will pay for the wall and how... wait i just found a site that shows 492 false claims https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.00a0f109785d

 

Ahh yes, the Washington Post, truly the pinnacle of unbiased new sources

 

First of all, if you even paid attention to what Trump actually said (you obviously didn't), you would know the obvious truth that Mexico can and should pay for the wall through the trade agreement the US has with them and Canada to abolish NAFTA, as well as visa fees and tariffs.
Secondly, every single claim on that article is bull shite. Just another failed attempt to make the president look bad, because they don't like it when Trump calls them out on their deceptive tricks.
You are proving yourself to be a lazy azz who can't come up with a single counter-argument without immediately flocking to Google for resources. You have no information on your own, and no logical grounds to stand on. My prediction is, you're either going to pick a few examples from your article or you're going to look online for another argument.

 

I pray you're being sarcastic.

 

ok why don't you prove it to me that they're all fake and that your orange headass is an honest angel that came from heaven

 

All those points are either exaggerations or have misinformed sources. To prove it to you, I'll give you an example of one you mentioned: Funding of the wall.
Forbes and factchecker.com ( I think) both incorrectly claimed that Trump expected a fat check from Mexico to fund the border wall, but instead, Trump ACTUALLY kept referring to indirect funding methods time and time again. So there you have it Cobra. Two trusted, HIGHLY regarded fact-checking sites, both have the same information wrong about Trump. It's a scam.
Also, I'm not here to prove that Trump is an "honest angel from heaven." I most certainly don't worship Trump. I just don't like it when people are so blind in their hatred that they use every little thing against him, and when Trump takes a breath the media will point to that as proof that he's a racist.

 

i guess i will be more obvious next time. yes that is sarcasm

 

He was still wrong I don't see any indirect funding coming from Mexico. You can't deny that trump lies a lot.

 

Trump wasn't wrong. I'm sorry you're too stubborn to admit it, but you are definitely wrong in this case.
I already mentioned how indirect funding would occur, and it is definitely underway. It will happen. Mexico will pay for the wall.
Of course, I'm not saying that Trump has never lied before. He's only told as many lies in his life as anyone else has though. He isn't perfect.

 

Michelle cognac said so so its true.

 

What about cognac? Do you have a favorite? Hennessey maybe?