Feature Problems

Something weird is going on lately, why the heck is Sky Temple, Stratosphere, and Slopes in the Forest 2 featured?

First of all (no offence to seasnails and amitabh),
why was sky temple and stratosphere ever considered to be featured. i can name more than 10 tracks easily that are better, longer, more detail, and has a better ride than these two tracks

secondly,
i admit Slopes in the Forest 2 is a good track but it is good in terms of ride. It does not have much detail and most of the detail are poor in terms of feature standard. it would be way more fitting to put it in the campaigns section but not the featured section.'


Edited:
and for stratosphere, i admit seasnails spent a lot of time getting the chute correctly but you do not give a feature just because u spent a lot of time on a track. if u remove the chute, u find that that it is only a good trial as the clouds are not that 'good' .

the feature info tread does not state that u give a feature just because someone has spend a lot of time on it. and who knows? making a huge repetitive part can be easily achieved with a computer program as players had done in the past

 

whole-heartedly agree

 

The only track that should be on there is Sky Temple

 

dont know if im blind but the detail looks un-finished/rushed

e; also, zoom out. TONS of blank space. Refer to the feature guidelines if you're confused on why I'm bringing this up

 

Oh, well I never really zoom out, I see now

 

Personally I think Stratosphere is amazing. It's a pretty cool concept with amazing detail. Even if it's short, I think it's a new enough idea and an awesome enough work of art to be featured.

That's just me tho

 

Feature standards were lowered

 

No, you don't say

 

What happened is we added pssst to the featured track moderators. There wasn't much of a group discussion, and he got a little trigger happy imo.
Not his direct fault as we didn't explain that to him. It will be cleaned up soon. All future featured tracks now require voting within the track moderators forum.

 

Thank you

 

lol of course he features a track he worked on

 

then are u gonna remove the feature like u did with team phantom's death to life?

 

since a lot of the community on the database love autos, there needs to be a feature mod that can admire autos for what they are.



COUGH

 

That said, there haven't been many feature worthy autos on frhd so far

 

F1N created many good ones.

(sor, im still not used to mentioning him as a "noob")

 

none of those were long enough

 

and they didn't agree to make mine featured : https://www.freeriderhd.com/t/460534-long-journey

 

it does not have enough detail, ur trying to imitate wyatt stonhouses feature, but wyatts track has more detail and also is considerably longer

 

the featured tracks moderators were discussing about it pssst said that the line spam under and around anything makes things look bad. And too much of that, will kill tracks from an aestethic aspect.
P.S : I don't imitate wyattstonhouse .... It's my personal style

 

the featured tracks moderators were discussing about it pssst said that the line spam under and around anything makes things look bad. And too much of that, will kill tracks from an aestethic aspect. And there are another reasons...
P.S : I don't imitate wyattstonhouse .... It's my personal style