It's his opinion, and he's right: it's not your place to judge. Personally, I don't find any of your tracks feature-worthy, but I have never told you that your opinions are bad or worthless. Don't tell people what to think.
Honestly idk how I feel about the change. On one hand this pleases more (most) people and the featured page will be more active, but on the other hand it kind of loses the challenge of making a track good enough to make the page. Instead of having to please at minimum 3 people you now only have to please 1, and idk how I feel about that. But hey, whats done is done And how old is 'old' because there are some RC3 tracks that should be featured with the new lower standard Edit: Why was this http://www.freeriderhd.com/t/236444-enciklopedia-read-desc Featured over Wyatts track? Wyatts was done better and they have the exact same features, only done better by Wyatt. Tf!? I know you guys dont want to go back but Wyatts track needs the feat, just as cranes has since last year Edit 2: Not to say that KONSTRUKT's was done badly lol
I hate to be the bearer of bad news and insult another user's track, especially there first feature. But that track is absolute ****.
when you feature this http://www.freeriderhd.com/t/236444-enciklopedia-read-desc , you have to feature this as well http://www.freeriderhd.com/t/229102-double-compound ...
support. double compound *cough* e <3 *cough* for feature 2016 no i am not shamelessly self promoting what are you talking about
You could pretty much feature the top 10 Round 1, top 7 Round 2 and top 3 of RC4, because they'd all be over twice as good as the the track by Konstrukt.