Games Contest

BlobGuy · Apr 28, 2015

thanks for positive feedback Komo , its really nice to see my work appreciated.

weem · Apr 28, 2015

"amazing art" by Stig

Stig · Apr 28, 2015

WheelieMaker said: ↑

"amazing art" by Stig
Click to expand...

thanks!

Gl4 · Apr 28, 2015

http://frhd.co/t/126125-final-fantasy this is my entry, even though it is really bad hope you enjoy!

Flying_T_Rex · May 4, 2015

Well, I just went partially ape on Lightning-Quick in 1 single profile post because he ain't started judging yet.

Stig · May 4, 2015

Flying_T_Rex said: ↑

Well, I just went partially ape on Lightning-Quick in 1 single profile post because he ain't started judging yet.
Click to expand...

i sent a pm to Char about making komo's results the official ones, and just transferring the money from lightning_quick's user to the winners, but as usual it takes him a 100years to respond, that is if he ever responds at all.

Char · May 4, 2015

Give him another week.

Char · May 4, 2015

Stig said: ↑

i sent a pm to Char about making komo's results the official ones, and just transferring the money from lightning_quick's user to the winners, but as usual it takes him a 100years to respond, that is if he ever responds at all.
Click to expand...

Sorry Stig, I didn't get a chance to respond as this issue is kind of complicated , it fell by the wayside.

Lightning-Quick · May 7, 2015

I've given out rewards

Skeeny · May 8, 2015

Komo said: ↑

BlobGuy -BattleBlock Theatre -BattleBlock Theatre

Track/ Ridability: 6
Detail: 6.5

Relation to the game: 6.5

Some of the detail seemed a bit sloppy, while the track itself was difficult to follow through, and was not a trial track. Therefore, I gave the track itself a 6 for the clear lines, but the positioning of the track itself was hard to understand. The detail/relation to the game was quite clear, including the characters from the game, as well as keeping the lines clean. I feel like you could’ve spent much more time on it, but it was a good track, nothing too special.

Todredrob -Pokemon

Track/ Ridability: 4.5
Detail: 4

Relation to the game: 3

The track started off as a short auto, then progressed into a playable track, so it was creative...I guess? It was hard to follow on what the track actually was, but it was smooth to ride. The rest...I was confused. Were you trying? There were random lines and blocks of black in random places, and the writing of “pokemon” was extremely messy. The drawn pokemon was the reason I gave a 4, because of the clean lines and resemblance to the pokemon. Besides that, the extra lines and random things were just confusing, so the relation to the game was a 3. Could’ve spent a lot more time on the detail and writing.

Flying_T_Rex -Legends of Zelda

Track/ Ridability: 4.5
Detail: 7

Relation to the game: 5

The track itself wasn’t very smooth, but I understand that it was more based on detail. Since the track isn’t complete yet, I just judged on the preview you put up. The track wasn’t really ridable, a bit rocky and un-smooth in places, so I gave it a 4.5. The detail was fantastic, but since there was so little of it I could only give it a 7, and I gave a 5 for the relation to the game because honestly, if you didn’t know it was for Zelda, you’d just think it was a forest. No characters, or anything. Also, the track is very small. I can’t wait to see the final track though!

Woodmas -Cabela's series - Cabela's

Track/ Ridability: 6
Detail: 4.5

Relation to the game: 5

The track was a smooth, uncomplicated ride. The reason why I gave it a 6 was it’s common-ness and how you only put slight jumps and that was it. Not to mention it was fairly short, it seemed as if you barely put much effort into it. The detail was simple, with a few people and animals, and not much. This was the same reason I gave the relation to the game a 5, because of it’s overly simple details. If you hadn’t put Cabela’s in the title, I would think it was an average detailed deer and people track. Nothing that put it in the “Cabela’s” catergory.

Skeeny -Mario Kart

Track/ Ridability: 6.5
Detail: 7

Relation to the game: 7.5

The track itself was a hold-up, and it worked! it was smooth, clean, and easy to ride. I took off 3.5 points for lack of creativity, because I would’ve preferred a track for the rider to play on instead. But aside from the track, the detail was pretty good! The pixel art was clean and well done, and you could tell clearly what the characters were supposed to be. It slides in smooth with the next requirement, which is that the track went very well with the theme, mario kart. The 2.5 points were taken off because there were no actual KARTS, so there was that tangent missing. Aside from that, great track!

Stig- Mario Bros

Track/ Ridability: 8.5
Detail: 9.5

Relation to the game: 10

The track was a bit complicated to follow with, but other than that, you put a lot of effort into the incorporating the track into the detail, so I gave an 8 for the track itself. The 1.5 points were taken off for some awkward parts where I didn’t know where to go, but if you looked at the ghosts, you would see that the track flows very nice together. The detail was simple amazing, with the whole level in the track. I was flabbergasted to see all the amazing art and characters, and background. You made it seem like the game was just layered into FRHD, so very well done on the detail. .5 points taken off because as amazing as it was, there’s always room for improvement Relation to the game received full points from me, well, it’s pretty obvious. It looked exactly like the actual game! Very well done, I can tell it took a lot of time.

jroles -Tetris - Tetris

Track/ Ridability: 0.5
Detail: 5.5

Relation to the game: 6

There literally was no track whatsoever, you just pushed the up key so get the star...no flow, no track. I gave a 0.5, and even that was being generous. The detail was fairly good, the lines were clean and there were no random scribbles. I feel like you could’ve shaded more, but it’s up to you. I compared it to a real picture of tetris, and the art/detail was fairly accurate! There were some missing details, so I gave a 6 for the relation to the game. Overall, the track basically nothing, but the detail was okay. It was a decent track, it just looked like you spent 10 minutes on it.

kadinl14 -Excitebike

Track/ Ridability: 6.5
Detail: 5.5

Relation to the game: 7

The track itself tied in nicely with the game, and it gave a slight challenge to normal riders! it was fun, and the track was decent length, but it was nothing too special. The detail was simple, created out of lines and no shading. Aside from that, it was VERY neat, and the relation to the game was great! If you compared the real game to it, they were very similar in shape, so I gave a 7 for the similarities. Overall, it was a fairly simple track with decent detail.

FreeRider5 -Angry Birds

Track/ Ridability: 2.5
Detail: 4

Relation to the game: 4.5

The track itself was….really simple, and short. Nothing more to be said. The detail was a bit sloppy, and again, it was fairly short. It was fairly neat in the writing though, but there wasn’t too much detail besides the birds. It looked like angry birds though, which got you the 4.5, because you could easily tell that it was Angry Birds. So in a nutshell, it looked like something you made in 10 minutes, there wasn’t too much effort from what I saw. It was a fairly normal track.

1st Place- Stig (Super Mario Bros)
2nd Place- Skeeny (Mario Kart)
3rd Place- Tie: Kadinl14 and Blobguy (Excitebike & Battleblock Theater)
Congratulations to the winners, and to those who participated!
Coin award has nothing to do with me, that's for Lightning-Quick to decide and handle.
Click to expand...

I didn't even notice! I actually come 2nd... thanks soo much!

Skeeny · May 8, 2015

Lightning-Quick said: ↑

I've given out rewards
Click to expand...

It's all good about how lono it took. I'm patient.

IsaiahRed · Nov 23, 2015

Can you do the contest again but change some of the rules.

Todredrob · Nov 23, 2015

Gangstalicious said: ↑

Can you do the contest again but change some of the rules.
Click to expand...

And be more active

Todredrob · Nov 23, 2015

Komo said: ↑

BlobGuy -BattleBlock Theatre -BattleBlock Theatre

Track/ Ridability: 6
Detail: 6.5

Relation to the game: 6.5

Some of the detail seemed a bit sloppy, while the track itself was difficult to follow through, and was not a trial track. Therefore, I gave the track itself a 6 for the clear lines, but the positioning of the track itself was hard to understand. The detail/relation to the game was quite clear, including the characters from the game, as well as keeping the lines clean. I feel like you could’ve spent much more time on it, but it was a good track, nothing too special.

Todredrob -Pokemon

Track/ Ridability: 4.5
Detail: 4

Relation to the game: 3

The track started off as a short auto, then progressed into a playable track, so it was creative...I guess? It was hard to follow on what the track actually was, but it was smooth to ride. The rest...I was confused. Were you trying? There were random lines and blocks of black in random places, and the writing of “pokemon” was extremely messy. The drawn pokemon was the reason I gave a 4, because of the clean lines and resemblance to the pokemon. Besides that, the extra lines and random things were just confusing, so the relation to the game was a 3. Could’ve spent a lot more time on the detail and writing.

Flying_T_Rex -Legends of Zelda

Track/ Ridability: 4.5
Detail: 7

Relation to the game: 5

The track itself wasn’t very smooth, but I understand that it was more based on detail. Since the track isn’t complete yet, I just judged on the preview you put up. The track wasn’t really ridable, a bit rocky and un-smooth in places, so I gave it a 4.5. The detail was fantastic, but since there was so little of it I could only give it a 7, and I gave a 5 for the relation to the game because honestly, if you didn’t know it was for Zelda, you’d just think it was a forest. No characters, or anything. Also, the track is very small. I can’t wait to see the final track though!

Woodmas -Cabela's series - Cabela's

Track/ Ridability: 6
Detail: 4.5

Relation to the game: 5

The track was a smooth, uncomplicated ride. The reason why I gave it a 6 was it’s common-ness and how you only put slight jumps and that was it. Not to mention it was fairly short, it seemed as if you barely put much effort into it. The detail was simple, with a few people and animals, and not much. This was the same reason I gave the relation to the game a 5, because of it’s overly simple details. If you hadn’t put Cabela’s in the title, I would think it was an average detailed deer and people track. Nothing that put it in the “Cabela’s” catergory.

Skeeny -Mario Kart

Track/ Ridability: 6.5
Detail: 7

Relation to the game: 7.5

The track itself was a hold-up, and it worked! it was smooth, clean, and easy to ride. I took off 3.5 points for lack of creativity, because I would’ve preferred a track for the rider to play on instead. But aside from the track, the detail was pretty good! The pixel art was clean and well done, and you could tell clearly what the characters were supposed to be. It slides in smooth with the next requirement, which is that the track went very well with the theme, mario kart. The 2.5 points were taken off because there were no actual KARTS, so there was that tangent missing. Aside from that, great track!

Stig- Mario Bros

Track/ Ridability: 8.5
Detail: 9.5

Relation to the game: 10

The track was a bit complicated to follow with, but other than that, you put a lot of effort into the incorporating the track into the detail, so I gave an 8 for the track itself. The 1.5 points were taken off for some awkward parts where I didn’t know where to go, but if you looked at the ghosts, you would see that the track flows very nice together. The detail was simple amazing, with the whole level in the track. I was flabbergasted to see all the amazing art and characters, and background. You made it seem like the game was just layered into FRHD, so very well done on the detail. .5 points taken off because as amazing as it was, there’s always room for improvement Relation to the game received full points from me, well, it’s pretty obvious. It looked exactly like the actual game! Very well done, I can tell it took a lot of time.

jroles -Tetris - Tetris

Track/ Ridability: 0.5
Detail: 5.5

Relation to the game: 6

There literally was no track whatsoever, you just pushed the up key so get the star...no flow, no track. I gave a 0.5, and even that was being generous. The detail was fairly good, the lines were clean and there were no random scribbles. I feel like you could’ve shaded more, but it’s up to you. I compared it to a real picture of tetris, and the art/detail was fairly accurate! There were some missing details, so I gave a 6 for the relation to the game. Overall, the track basically nothing, but the detail was okay. It was a decent track, it just looked like you spent 10 minutes on it.

kadinl14 -Excitebike

Track/ Ridability: 6.5
Detail: 5.5

Relation to the game: 7

The track itself tied in nicely with the game, and it gave a slight challenge to normal riders! it was fun, and the track was decent length, but it was nothing too special. The detail was simple, created out of lines and no shading. Aside from that, it was VERY neat, and the relation to the game was great! If you compared the real game to it, they were very similar in shape, so I gave a 7 for the similarities. Overall, it was a fairly simple track with decent detail.

FreeRider5 -Angry Birds

Track/ Ridability: 2.5
Detail: 4

Relation to the game: 4.5

The track itself was….really simple, and short. Nothing more to be said. The detail was a bit sloppy, and again, it was fairly short. It was fairly neat in the writing though, but there wasn’t too much detail besides the birds. It looked like angry birds though, which got you the 4.5, because you could easily tell that it was Angry Birds. So in a nutshell, it looked like something you made in 10 minutes, there wasn’t too much effort from what I saw. It was a fairly normal track.

1st Place- Stig (Super Mario Bros)
2nd Place- Skeeny (Mario Kart)
3rd Place- Tie: Kadinl14 and Blobguy (Excitebike & Battleblock Theater)
Congratulations to the winners, and to those who participated!
Coin award has nothing to do with me, that's for Lightning-Quick to decide and handle.
Click to expand...

I sucked back the )-:

Lightning-Quick · Nov 23, 2015

I'm not having another games contest, but I will start a contest after one the official contest.

jroles · Nov 23, 2015

Lightning-Quick said: ↑

I'm not having another games contest, but I will start a contest after one the official contest.
Click to expand...

Did i gget 4th

Lightning-Quick · Nov 23, 2015

jroles said: ↑

Did i gget 4th
Click to expand...

Idk, Go and check

jroles · Nov 24, 2015

Lightning-Quick said: ↑

Idk, Go and check
Click to expand...

u

Jgeleta1 · Nov 24, 2015

jroles said: ↑

u
Click to expand...

U didnt

Log in

Games Contest

BlobGuy Active Member Official Author

weem FREE RIDER LEGEND Elite Author Team Blob Official Author

Stig Stig VIP Official Author

Gl4 Active Member Official Author

Flying_T_Rex Well-Known Member Team Blob Official Author

Stig Stig VIP Official Author

Char Free Rider HD Developer Official Author

Char Free Rider HD Developer Official Author

Lightning-Quick Well-Known Member Official Author

Skeeny Well-Known Member Official Author

Skeeny Well-Known Member Official Author

IsaiahRed Well-Known Member Official Author

Todredrob Well-Known Member Team Helicopter Official Author

Todredrob Well-Known Member Team Helicopter Official Author

Lightning-Quick Well-Known Member Official Author

jroles Well-Known Member

Lightning-Quick Well-Known Member Official Author

jroles Well-Known Member

Jgeleta1 Active Member Official Author

Share This Page