ouch, good point
but yeah, i see how bringing up National Coalition Party (Kok), for example, would've been better for this case but virtually none of the finns party's (PS) economic policies go near as far left as bernie's.
i mean, reading both sides' policies rn and most of what berne wants seems to be spend lots of money and most of what the Finns Party wants is to save money. wouldnt that be something
the reason i brought up PS is because calling it right wing is easy in english. see, the meaning of right wing doesnt translate into finnish and contain the same meaning. its just a little shortcut, im sure you understand.
edit: plus, my point wasn't necessarily on the economic front as a whole, it was right-wingness in general. the whole bernie comment was a big hypothetical
inb4 wHy BrInG iT uP tHeN !?!? the other party i mentioned here has actually won elections lol, our current president was a representative in the party before his presidency. (also currently sits at around the same approval as PS, but it's whatever)
quick couple of questions, do you think bernie represents scandinavia (the nordic countries) fairly?
i know you didnt say anyhting about this but thats why im asking. do you believe we should blatantly misrepresent statistics about a global pandemic to drive a narrative, and then blame the other side "this shouldn't be about politics!!!
people are dyinggg! ! !1 !
" just to virtue signal? especially that it turns out that state leadership, at least, doesn't seem to have any significant effect on the rate or amount of infections per capita.
i hope to hear from you soon enough.
Click to expand...
