FRHD Chat Thread

Approximately 8.5k priests is a whole lot better than about 25k terrorists in isis alone, that isn't including the members of other terrorists groups (of which there are hundreds) as well as the "lone wolf" and isolated radicals plotting attacks.

 

Yeah you're right, Muslims are more of an issue, check this out.
Radical muslims against muslim population (est)- 25000/1600000000 times 100 = 0.0015625%
Paedophilic Catholic priests against catholic population(est)- 8500/1200000000 times 100 = 0.0007083%
e: If I didn't do this right don't hurt me I tried my best.

 

Idk if you're agreeing or refuting but the Muslim figures are greater than the catholic figures. Good debate, I enjoyed talking to someone with intelligence who won't illogically jump down your throat when you make a conversial claim

 

Might flood in Louisiana again
last time:

 

Don't conflate all of Christianity with Catholicism. Also, as far as I'm aware, Christianity & Catholicism cannot be blamed for pedophilia within the church, as there are no verses that condone it, meanwhile Islam permits and encourages Jihad. Secondly, I am neither a part of the Catholic Church nor a member of the KKK.

 

this just in: followers of a religion that for the most part live in the backwater s***holes of the world are more prone to terrorism than followers of a religion that are mostly situated in developed countries. could this have more to do with the difference in development and living conditions than the difference in religion? find out at 11

 

Debatable, developing countries like Ethiopia are majority Christian yet there are hardly any Christian terror attacks anywhere, I can't find a single stat of significance regarding Christian terror attacks in...any nation, majority Christian or not. Yet according to thereligionofpeace, over 30,000 deadly Islamic terror attacks have been carried out since 9/11. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30 Last 30 days alone. Islam really is different.

 

What's poppin fools

 

Poppin and droppin

 

Not to brag but on diepio I got a mass of 266,000 for any of you diepio players out there

 

diepio is dead, along with all other .io games

 

Francis pope. Get it?

 

wow.


can't unsee

 

F

Feel the cringe

 

Not to brag but I got 400,000

 

What's your name on diepio

 

trump done f*cked up yesterday thought that by ditching hillary that USA would dodge a warmonger but it appears there was no dodging that bullet

 

looooool you're pathetic you were swearing for the love of god that trump were the only solution and that he was the unexpected messie and now you're complaining and you realize that youl elected a dangerous psychopath who can get mad whenever he want and kill thousands of innocents

 

dawned*

listen up phaggot

Everyone knows that, nearing the end of the election, there was one of two options; Trump or Clinton, it became a dichotomy in where there was no other logical step to take but to pick a side and argue that side, that is if you were to be involved in the election debate at all. One of the two was going to win. Anyone spouting their, "BERNIE FOR LIFE" bullsh*t was wasting their f*cking breath. And regarding rhetoric, Trump was the least likely to have done this. Hillary claimed multiple times in the presidential debates that she would take "military action" against Russia via no-fly zones in Syria based on nothing more than speculation. This is a dangerous road to go down, she didn't even need evidence to want to proceed with force. Trump, on the other hand, adamantly denounced the Iraq war, even though there may have been contradictory statements regarding this prior to the war, during his campaign he was solidly against it. He claimed to want to get along with Russia. Hillary didn't. So let's recap:

-One candidate claimed to want to take military action.
-One did not.

If you don't support this military action, which I don't, it was an obvious choice, take the chance over the guarantee. Walk the road of uncertainty instead of the one you know you will perish. Simple as that.
FYI I'm Canadian, you obviously haven't read *any* of my posts thoroughly if you think I actually voted for Trump. I couldn't have, I merely supported him over the demonstrably criminal, corrupt candidate the democrats propped up over any legitimate ones running.