Trump or no Trump

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/25/donald-trumps-ghostwriter-tells-all

 

He's was rasist towards blacks 40-50 years ago. He wants to have the ILLEGAL immigrants out of the US. If he ever does order a nuclear strike, nobody will know if it was his fault because there will always be a person to take the blame for him.

 

he is racist. he was and he is. and if he push the nuclear button, that will be the end of our civilization. nobody will be here for say if it's him or nah.

 

really? you don't think that's wrong? and on top of that, he's still clearly a racist. he suggested a blacks vs. whites season of the apprentice. his rhetoric against muslims and illegal immigrants is the textbook definition of racist. it's not too hard to see.

a stupid idea. illegal immigrants often take the jobs most americans won't take. there have been studies done that prove that having illegal immigrants help the economy as well. plus, how do you suggest mr. trump rids the US of every single illegal immigrant living within the US?

oh, ok. so it's fine for him to launch a nuclear missile and effectively cause ww3 if he can blame it on someone else. nice.

 

i guess we are the same person. you are exactly saying what i think.

 

like i am going to believe the most liberal news company in america... it would be like you beliving everything fox news says
i don't know trumps inner feelings but he does not act racist

 

FDT
There's not a strong case for home being a racist, even though he's been endorsed by the leader of the KKK. So it's regressive to the case against him to accuse him of being so. This election season both Clinton and Trump are horrible candidates, so my argument will try to use facts only as a way of eliminating bias and explaining why Trump won't be a good president.
Trump doesn't seem to have a case for his foreign policy. The main things he says he wants to accomplish are Banning Muslims, Building a Wall and Deporting Illegal Immigrants. None of these things he could actually enforce as president realistically. I'll begin with the first one. Banning a religious demographic from entering the US goes against the Constitutional right of freedom of worship and religious practice. Even an executive order, would be shut down by the Supreme Court instantly. Building a wall and having the Mexicans pay for it; the only explanation Trump has given us for how he will pull it off is this: he is a good business man. Building a wall covering the entire border, itself, will take years. Secondly, Mexico won't pay for it as they don't have the national budget or resources. Even if they agreed to pay, the corruption in the Mexican system would take decades to scrape up the money by raising taxes and living costs; creating more demand for Mexicans to enter the US and many more illegals. Deporting mass amounts of illegal immigrants; Every president has worked to find illegals, but the simple truth is that they are hard to find and hard to deal with. Firstly, nobody has a list of illegals; they are illegal because of that. How can you find someone you don't know exists? It's worked like this in the past; illegals are caught by chance. Trump hasn't presented a plan for this policy either.

My conclusion is that he's brought up issues that he can't solve legally especially as president, but he has made traction with his supporters because he says he will solve problems that they fear. Which is fear mongering. Not that it matters anyways. As I said earlier, I don't support Clinton and I could write the same argument against her too. If you don't know which candidate to vote for, honestly, I'd tell you to vote Hillary. She has a career of experience, and whether you like her policies or not, at least you know what they are.

 

Whatever is the outcome of the election; what happens next with either of the candidates behind the wheel, is the fault of every american citizen.

The way your country is built up now, cant be fixed by either democrats or republicans. Tbh bernie was your chance to get it right, and you blew it.

 

No, the Democratic Party blew it. At least his nomination. There's no way of telling whether or not he would have won the general election but he definitely would have beat Hillary.

 

very close to the conclusion i came to
i hated trump and thought he was just a stupid idiot full of hot air but as i did more research and when Ben Carson (the guy i was supporting) quit i realized that our country needs someone like Trump to get us out of this terrible mess we as a country are in right now.

 

You are partially right, but the system that allowed that to happen, has been growing for years. You're now at a point where political corruption is all consuming, on both sides.
Now we're even experiencing other nations interfering and collaborating with american politicians, to affect the elections.

It's a farse.
I'm sorry to break it to anyone here who still sits on the traditional destructive nationalistic views, but socialism is the cure (to a certain extent, not commy level).

 

that's not the new yorker who said it first. you're actually saying that the new yorker, who everybody know, are writing fake. so they just wrote something that every newspaper wrote. you can't say "i don't believe in new yorker news"when all the newspaper in all the countrys are writing it.

 

Your grammar is very difficult to understand so I am currently unable to get the point you tried to make.

 

haha sorry french guys are really difficults to understand
was just trying to reply when you said that you don't believe in new yorker news.i edited the post, hope you can understand it now.

 

#imwithher

 

all u nigg*rs with #jrolesstrong i bless u.
also Stig whens ur new mixtape coming out

 

christmas maybe

 

lol that's a while. can't wait tho! who's cover did you choose? robbity's?

 

stig, the_rider owes me 17k coins and won't pay :| waht do i do?!!