ok stoo comparing tracks to enciklopedia. could the track be better? yes. does that mean yu should use it as a comparison tool for the lowest quality of featured tracks? no. it deserved a feature andnt got one
The worst track on the list is the standard, because if a track that bad gets in, it's only fair that tracks better than it get in too.
It isn't about it being a WIP, it's about this (http://www.freeriderhd.com/t/236444-enciklopedia-read-desc) getting featured. Srsly, why? Everything even slightly better than this average track should now be featured. I suggest featuring my detailed autos (http://www.freeriderhd.com/t/131195-cave-wheelie and http://www.freeriderhd.com/t/155086-cave-auto) even though the detail may not be the best, it isn't good in that (the 1st link) either. My autos actually took a tiny bit of skill to make. Edit: also now that this is featured (the 1st link once again), why isn't Rotate II?
We will not be reactng to your comparisons in "quality" between tracks that are, and are not featured. it's a matter of subjective opinion, in which our opinion sometimes may vary from others. We will spend little to no time justifying our decissions due to this. WE may have to justify them to the other feat mods in some cases, which is why we have a selected team, and not the entire member list to do this You may try to pursuade us to featuing tracks however, but we'd prefer if you left out comparisons as an argument, and exchange it with something useful
Featured tracks quality has gone down. Nowadays, I see really big tracks that are under-detailed. I have nothing against Martian, InterAmnia, Subharmonic, etc. But I want to see that 741k used towards really good details.
Personally, I really like the change. We do need a best of the best section though, because some featured tracks are 10x better than others.